The accuracy of evidence collected by anti-piracy tracking company Media Protector has been called into doubt. It is alleged that the recipient of a 700 Euros compensation demand for unauthorized uploading was actually operating a client which was modified never to upload, thus making infringement impossible.
"The client itself had never been reset and displayed a operating time of 924 days and it had never distributed a file."
That's pretty disgusting that the courts don't even look into how the evidence is being collected. As far as I'm concerned, What media defender is doing is criminal. If this isn't proof... I don't know what is.
read more | digg story
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment